Search

Was the hearing procedurally unfair because the school and the governing board had private conversations about the exclusion?

Was the hearing procedurally unfair because the school and the governing board had private conversations about the exclusion?

Introduction

Paragraph 112 of the exclusions guidance makes it clear that the governing board should not discuss the exclusion with anyone outside of the hearing.

If the headteacher and school staff are already present in the room at the start of the hearing or they remain behind when the family is asked to leave, this may constitute an unfair process because the school is having access to the governing board in confidence, which may indicate bias and/or an abuse of process. Where the appearance of bias exists, that is enough to jeopardise the legal standing of the governing board's decision-making because justice must not just be done but be seen to be done.

Next step? 

Consider the records of the governing board hearing and speak with the family.

Answer the question: Did the governing board and the school speak about, or appear to speak about, the exclusion without the family being present?

If the answer is yes, consider using the Suggested Wording document: Argument to the IRP: Governing board's decision unfair (private conversations)

Once you have answered this question, click continue to proceed to the next step.

 

Continue

On this page

This information is correct at the time of writing, 5th September 2023. The law in this area is subject to change.

Coram Children’s Legal Centre cannot be held responsible if changes to the law outdate this publication. Individuals may print or photocopy information in CCLC publications for their personal use.

Professionals, organisations and institutions must obtain permission from the CCLC to print or photocopy our publications in full or in part.